There are three levels in the listening taxonomy, and each level in nested within the next:
The purpose of listening at this level is to assess what is being studied. In other words, to check for right or wrong answers, or to find something that the teacher is trying to correct. We do this all the time in a class. Can anyone tell me what this is called? Who can tell me what 6x7 equals? In this context, the teacher is not listening to the student, but rather, they are listening for an answer that is already in their head. They are listening for what they are thinking, not what the student is thinking.
It is important. It is about checking on what was studied, or checking for understanding. We need to be on the same page, or near the same page, to move forward. There needs to be some redundancy in our group knowledge if we are going to continue to inquire further. That being said, it is one part of the listening process, and if it becomes the main focus of the classroom dialogue, then it will limit inquiry, and it will give the teacher a partial (very small) slice of a students comprehension or understanding of a given concept. It is useful, but it needs to be one of many ears that a teacher has to use.
Also, a teacher listening for something that is already in their head creates a perception of knowledge as being in the hands of the teacher, and access to that knowledge is only accessible through the teacher. The role of the student is to guess (or know) what the teacher is thinking.
In this level of listening, the teacher is looking for the interpretation that the student is bringing to their answer. Through a constructivist understanding, the teachers main impetus here is to listen for an embodied history within that child and to make an interpretation regarding their meaning and implicit understandings behind their response. Questioning and dialogue with students now moves from the right/wrong of evaluative listening, into how/why do you think that. The main role of the teacher is seeking information. This is done primarily through more elaborate explanations and demonstrations. Can you tell me why you think that? Could you give me another example? Could you phrase that differently? In the case of these questions, the teacher is attempting to get inside the child's head to interpret what they are thinking, and why they are seeing it in that way. Once a teacher understands the rational and thinking behind a student response, they are better able to move them into a more fruitful direction, or to challenge them to think differently.
This opens new space for understanding and learning. However, for the most part, the interpretive listening is still done purposefully to help a student with a specific concept. It is limiting in the sense that we are still trying to achieve an end result. There is a goal. The teacher is listening in order to guide the student in the right direction (right being the grander understanding in the lesson or unit). In this sense, it is very much like evaluative listening. The knowledge still resides in the teacher, and access to that knowledge by a student is still through the teacher. Instead of the student trying to guess (or know) what the teacher is thinking, they are using their past experience and collaborating to get down the path that the teacher has laid out for them.
Hermeneutic listening is all about seeking variation and participating in making meaning. In this level, the class members and the teacher are jointly exploring a concept and co-developing new ways of seeing the idea, rather than mastering already fragmented pieces of the concepts. The first two levels of listening treated knowing and knowledge as an attainable thing with a path that was laid out. Students had to find their way down that path, and the teacher listened in two different ways to get them there.
In the level of hermeneutic listening, it is an altogether different path and a different way of viewing the role of the teacher. The concept or subject itself is more fluid, the unanticipated plays a major role, and intuition and feeling are noticeably present. The class is deconstructing a given concept with the hope that they will put it back together in a way that makes sense to them. The teacher is along for the ride, and is unaware what realizations or new knowings will arise. Since this is unexplored water and a fluid environment, the teacher moves from being the holder of knowledge, to a co-participant who is also deconstructing their own understanding alongside the learners.
For a teacher to participate in this kind of listening, they must be willing to reconsider and rebuild their own knowledge. It beckons for a more open way of being with the subject, and with yourself. The learning might be messy and unstructured, and it might not lead to anything conclusive or insightful, but the fundamental knowledge and understanding is on the table and is being examined and dissected through a diverse set of eyes. The class is bringing everything they know and is creating something new as a group, not as individuals. It is an exercise in transforming, reforming, and complicating our individual and collective understanding of what the subject/concept is.
This year, I hope to be more mindful of these layers, and to notice when it is appropriate to move from one level to the next. Each layer is important to a classroom, and is essential for learning. Knowing when and how to listen in different ways is something I am going to reflect and pay attention to which much greater care.